Ice Fishing essentials
Ice Fishing spin history and today's results
Use the Ice Fishing history as a dataset: choose the table, time window and record category first. Read the update status before interpreting a gap or an unusually large factor. Account profit requires accepted stakes and credited returns in addition to these public records.
Inspect recorded outcomes for a chosen interval and compare staking systems on an unchanged historical sequence. Updates are requested every 20 seconds, but the provider may publish later or deliver several records together.
Recorded spins in sequence
Recent spins and round history
Fetching recorded rounds…
Requesting the newest available round…
Preparing the recent results…
Individual rounds are checked at 20-second intervals. The list changes only when another record is published; a successful request need not contain a fresh spin.
Period overview
Ice Fishing statistics by period
Opening the statistics feed…
Awaiting the first data response
Inspect a rolling time window
Round statistics for your selection
Previous 30 minutes · fetching records…
How often each outcome appears in this window
Calculating outcome frequencies…
Counts and observed proportions are calculated from the individual records in the feed. Reference values come from the published 53-position wheel. A short sample may differ markedly from those long-run shares.
Explore the recorded sequence
Charts for Ice Fishing history
Compare this recorded sequence with the wheel’s reference proportions. The graphs describe how the sample developed; their colours, shapes and sequences do not reveal the next independent outcome.
Retrieving the spin sample…
Recent outcomes at a glance
One bar represents one spin: its height indicates the multiplier and its colour denotes the outcome.
Waiting for a usable round sample…Leaf 1Leaf 2Lil’ BluesBig OrangesHuge Reds
Fetching recorded rounds…
The bars show only the newest 50 spins within the selected sample. They use a linear vertical scale with a display ceiling to keep smaller values legible. A cap marker flags values above it. Tap or hover for the exact multiplier, or read the full entry in history.
Historical staking replay
Apply different stake sequences to one unchanged history
The model records a hit when the outcome matches the chosen position. With gross-return notation, credit equals stake × multiplier; with profit notation, it equals stake × (multiplier + 1). A non-matching round loses the stake. This models one betting position rather than a multi-selection combination.
Final bankroll—
Balance change—
Return on simulated stakes—
Highest placed stake—
Maximum peak-to-trough decline—
Fixed stake · balance after each spinWaiting for a usable round sample…
Calculating the historical replay…
Compare all systems on these records
| Staking system | Final bankroll | Balance change | Sample payout ratio | Highest stake | Rounds / matching outcomes | Replay status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preparing the system comparison… | ||||||
The sample payout ratio divides all modelled gross payouts by all modelled stakes in this historical run. It is not theoretical RTP. Every system uses the same sequence while changing wager amounts. Starting from your balance and base unit, the run stops when remaining funds cannot cover its next step. The source omits personal bets and table limits, so this illustrates assumptions rather than reconstructing a player account. It neither forecasts outcomes nor recommends a progression.
Observed shares and wheel probabilities
Each outcome's share of the chosen records
In the sampleWheel reference
Building the frequency comparison…
How the multipliers are distributed
Counts grouped by recorded multiplier range
Building the multiplier histogram…
Recorded wait since each fish
Elapsed spins beside the theoretical mean interval
Counting the current bonus gaps…
Bonus occurrence patterns
Observed shares and mean spacing in these records
Calculating bonus statistics…
Multiplier heatmap in blocks of 100 spins
Older blocks appear first; the newest block is at the bottom
| Block of spins | 1–2x | 2–5x | 5–10x | 10–25x | 25x+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preparing the heatmap blocks… | |||||
A source record contains an outcome, multiplier, bonus flag and timestamp. It does not disclose individual stakes, payments or winner counts. Waiting intervals measure earlier rounds, not an approaching deadline; those outcomes cannot change the next independent spin’s odds.
Make sense of the figures
A practical reading method for the results dashboard
Use the history for questions about completed play: which outcomes appeared, how their proportions compare with the wheel and what a fixed session contains. These views cover available records, not a future round’s result.
Keep the comparison window fixed
Match sample sizes or time intervals when comparing. Thirty minutes and 5,000 spins cover different amounts of play, so their percentages should not be treated as equivalent samples.
Separate wheel shares from observed counts
Observed frequency can fall above or below the reference, especially with few records. That difference describes the collected sample and does not require future spins to restore balance.
Treat waiting gaps as completed history
The gap counts recorded spins since the previous bonus. A theoretical mean is a many-round reference, not a timer. Reaching it does not make a result due.
Test one explicit set of assumptions
Set the target, starting balance and base unit before comparing the five progressions. Replay exactly the same rounds. The sample payout ratio belongs to that calculation, not to theoretical RTP or predicted future returns.
The independence principle
Independent rounds keep the same next-outcome probabilities regardless of their previous sequence. Hot or overdue labels, bright heatmap blocks, moving shares and RSI-style scores describe history without creating a prediction signal.
How progression rules change exposure
Seven approaches to examine on paper
These descriptions explain familiar staking progressions. None changes wheel probabilities or expected return. Increasing after losses can quickly exhaust a balance or reach table limits. Study the examples as stake-growth mechanics and historical assumptions, not instructions to chase an absent bonus.
Martingale applied to a fish outcome
Doubling after losses on one selected target
- For the example, fix one fish, a base unit and the maximum session loss before starting the sequence.
- In the classic rule, each loss doubles the next wager; a matching result returns it to the original unit.
- The predetermined loss or stake boundary ends the example even if the chosen fish has not appeared.
The history cannot make a longer fish wait improve its next chance. Increasing by 2.5 instead of doubling accelerates stake growth without creating an advantage.
Paroli after matching outcomes
An inverse progression that increases after wins
- Define the base amount and limit the sequence to three consecutive hits before the paper test begins.
- A modeled hit raises the following stake, commonly by doubling; a loss sends the next amount back to the base.
- Stop at the sequence cap or session limit rather than extending it because recent fish appear clustered.
A recent fish or strongly coloured heatmap block does not increase the probability of another matching outcome.
D’Alembert with gradual adjustments
Increase or decrease by one base unit
- Fix a base unit and use it for the first hypothetical wager.
- Add one unit after a loss; subtract one after a hit, with the base amount as the minimum.
- Document each target's progression separately and apply the original session limit to the test.
Choosing the fish with the longest gap changes your selection rule, not the probability of the next independent result.
Fibonacci and its expanding sequence
Progression values: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8…
- Define the value of one unit and the furthest allowed sequence position before running the example.
- The usual loss rule advances to the next value after each losing round.
- A hit steps back two positions without passing the beginning; the chosen loss or sequence boundary still ends the run.
Connecting a Fibonacci position to a gap counter adds another rule without improving odds. Later stakes in the sequence can rise sharply.
Labouchere and cancellation lists
Use the two ends of a unit list to set the stake
- Start a paper calculation with a fixed list, for example 1–2–3–4 units.
- Add the first and last entries for the next stake; a single remaining entry is used on its own.
- A modeled win removes the two endpoints. A loss adds the lost stake to the list's end. A predefined stake ceiling or session-loss limit must remain part of the example.
An outcome appearing below expectation does not owe money back. Variable bonus payouts also make ordinary cancellation arithmetic less straightforward.
Oscar’s Grind and a one-unit target
Increase after hits while the series remains below its goal
- For the example, choose a one-unit profit target and an independent maximum loss.
- A common version begins at one unit and leaves the stake unchanged after a loss. After a win it increases by one unit only while the series is still short of the target.
- End the series at its target, loss boundary or time limit; extending the boundary changes the original plan.
A fish in the history does not establish session profit. Qualifying stakes, prior losses and actual settlement determine the net amount.
Gap and heatmap filters: a paper experiment
A descriptive filter can look persuasive without predicting results
- Choose the sample size first, then compare the fish counts with the wheel's reference proportions.
- Labels such as a low observed share or long waiting gap describe those past records; they do not identify a result that must arrive.
- Keep hypothetical stakes flat in a paper test and compare them with a baseline on the same subsequent rounds. An unusual short-term average is not a reason to increase the amount at risk.
- Fix the test's ending point before inspecting the result and include losing runs. A historical comparison is never a promise about the next sample.
An RSI-style reading, heated average or combined filter has no demonstrated prediction edge here. Time and loss limits restrict exposure without altering the game odds.
These are explanations of stake mechanics. Amount and timing changes do not alter independent outcome probabilities. Borrowing, chasing a deficit or increasing wagers to recover money can amplify the damage from a losing sequence.
Select a result to explore
Ice Fishing outcome chart
Select a fish or leaf to highlight its chart entries and filter the table rows. This changes the displayed view, not the source records.
Fetching the outcome distribution…
Every outcome
This is a record of completed spins, with no forecast of the next result.
Period totals by outcome
Fish and leaf results in the sample
Each entry pairs an outcome image with its count and sample share. Selecting the matching chart row filters the table to that outcome.
| Outcome artwork | Wheel outcome | Recorded occurrences | Share of this sample | Covered period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Awaiting source data… | ||||
Counts and percentages come from the source’s 30-day historical distribution. The separate recent-round list contains individual spins, their multipliers and source times.
Recognise the three fish features
The fish bonuses behind the recorded results
Three fish features appear on Evolution’s 53-position wheel. The illustrations represent the same families throughout the dashboard. Their ranges below are base rule values before any applicable wheel boost.
Lil’ Blues
Blue’s base fish values run from 3x to 100x. A qualifying boost can multiply them before the catch reveal.
Big Oranges
Orange ranges from 4x to 200x at base, between the blue and red ranges.
Huge Reds
Red has the highest base range, 10x–500x. Its upper end is possible, not typical.
A range describes possible fish values. It does not establish trigger frequency or your session’s return.
From statistics to sensible interpretation
What historical results contribute to a strategy review
Previous spins are a record for analysis, not an established way to improve the next independent result.
The rules use 53 wheel positions and pre-spin multiplier assignments. A recent streak, missing fish or earlier large catch changes none of that. Statistics describe a selected history rather than identify a bonus that must arrive next.
Set control measures before the first wager: an entertainment budget, a compatible stake and time and loss boundaries. Retain those boundaries through a losing sequence. Increasing stakes to recover earlier losses adds exposure.
Fixed stake
An unchanged modest stake makes repeated-round costs easier to estimate, without increasing the underlying return.
Fix the stopping boundary
Set spending and time caps before starting. Treat them as boundaries, not targets that need to be exhausted.
Match each number to its purpose
RTP and wheel composition describe the mathematical model. Counts and charts describe the records already observed.
Questions about Ice Fishing records
Results and statistics FAQ
Summary and round data are requested every 20 seconds. The source decides when new records appear and may batch them. Check the newest timestamp and choose an available window from 5 minutes to 72 hours.
The selected interval filters timestamped records before counting outcomes, bonuses and multipliers. A fetched response may cover more history than the visible window. Longer selections request older records within the source’s available coverage.
The clip is a short presentation preview. The result feed carries data, not live video. An eligible account opens a playable table through its operator interface where available.
No. Completed independent rounds do not modify the next round’s probabilities. A bonus streak describes the sample without making another bonus more likely or inevitable.
It is matching outcomes divided by all recorded rounds in the selected sample. Random variation, particularly with few spins, can put it above or below the wheel reference.
One row covers up to 100 consecutive spins. Each cell counts a multiplier band and shows its proportion of that block. Deeper colour means a larger past share, not a prediction for the next block.
No. An average across repeated play does not schedule a specific sequence. A fish can arrive earlier or much later. Passing the average does not add next-spin probability.
The newest 50 selected rounds use a linear graph with a visible height ceiling so small outcomes stay readable. A cap marker denotes a higher actual value; hover or tap to read it precisely.
The replay follows one chosen outcome over identical records using fixed staking, Martingale, Paroli, D’Alembert or Fibonacci. It applies the stated multiplier convention and totals stakes and returns. Its payout ratio measures this sample, not theoretical RTP or future performance.
It is a hypothetical account under your selected settings. The source supplies outcomes, factors, bonus flags and timestamps without a player’s selections or settlements. The curve therefore illustrates a declared model of that history.
Classic Martingale keeps a fixed target, starts at the base, doubles after losses and resets after a hit. Repeated losses rapidly raise the next wager and cumulative cost. A long fish gap does not improve recovery chances.
The gap measures past play only. A 2.5 progression increases faster than doubling and can exhaust funds sooner, with no change to the selected outcome’s probability.
Paroli places larger stakes after hits and resets after a loss, usually with a predetermined step ceiling. This changes exposure timing. A recent hit or matching heatmap cluster does not raise next-round probability.
D’Alembert moves up or down by one base unit after a loss or hit, never below the base. Fibonacci advances through 1, 1, 2, 3, 5… on losses and generally retreats two places after a hit. These change stakes rather than outcome probabilities.
The cancellation list represents monetary units, not a debt in outcome frequency. Add its endpoints to set the stake; a modelled win removes them and a loss appends the wager. Missing fish do not make a longer list easier to complete.
A common version targets a small series profit, begins at one unit and raises stakes after wins while short of the goal. Losses leave the amount unchanged. The target may remain unmet, so separate maximum-loss and time limits are still needed.
They summarise selected past records without demonstrating prediction for independent spins. Rare or long-absent outcomes do not give a combined indicator a next-round advantage.
Review finished rounds, compare equivalent samples and observe variation in a recorded session. Set spending and time boundaries before play. Keep gap counters as historical measurements rather than reasons to chase a loss or increase stakes.
A losing sequence can make the next wager exceed either the table limit or remaining balance. Predetermined boundaries constrain time and money at risk. They do not guarantee recovery or profit.
Guide sections
Reading today’s results without confusion
Source times are UTC and are converted to the browser’s local zone. India Standard Time is UTC+05:30. A rolling 24-hour window begins 24 hours before now rather than covering 00:00–23:59 of a calendar day. To inspect yesterday, use an available 48- or 72-hour window and read record dates. A larger selection cannot reconstruct missing source history.
For this game, searches for a score usually mean the wheel outcome and factor, not a football-like match score. Read the leaf or fish label together with multiplier and timestamp. A large result is not money credited to every spectator.
For a total-return example, a qualifying 10-unit wager at 20x credits 200 units. If two other 10-unit bets lose, total stakes are 30 and net result is 200 − 30 = 170. This assumes the factor includes the winning stake and no cap intervenes. Actual payment is determined by the settled account record, all covered positions and the applicable rules.
Compare table edition first, then outcome sequence and source timestamps. Time zones, update schedules, missing records and delayed batches can produce differing displays. Refresh time is not wheel landing time. Resolve a personal payment question using the operator’s round ID and settled record rather than a third-party chart alone.
A stopped tracker may indicate connection failure, an unavailable endpoint or paused source updates. It does not itself prove table closure. Read status and the latest source time, check the connection and retry once. For the table, consult operator status and support. A frozen picture also does not establish cancellation of an accepted bet.
THE PRACTICAL DESK
Put the numbers to work
Change the example inputs to see how the arithmetic changes. These tools use the figures you enter; they do not read your casino account or predict a game result.
Sample frequency
EVOLUTION GAMES GUIDE